From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1895 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. E. C. Knight Co. Sugar Trust Case ," was a United States Supreme Court antitrust case that severely limited the federal government's power to pursue antitrust actions under the Sherman Antitrust Act . In Chief Justice Melville Fuller 's majority opinion, the Court held that the U.S. Congress could not regulate manufacturing and thus gave state governments the sole power to take legal action against manufacturing monopolies .[ 1] Swift & Co. v. United States interstate commerce .
In 1892, the American Sugar Refining Company gained control of the E. C. Knight Company and several others, which resulted in a 98% monopoly of the American sugar refining industry. U.S. President Grover Cleveland , in his second term of office (1893–1897), directed the national government to sue the Knight Company under the provisions of the Sherman Antitrust Act to prevent the acquisition. The question the court had to answer was, "could the Sherman Antitrust Act suppress a monopoly in the manufacture distribution
The Fuller Court . The court's 8–1 decision, handed down on January 21, 1895 and written by Chief Justice Melville Weston Fuller , went against the government. Justice John Marshall Harlan dissented.
The Court held "that the result of the transaction was the creation of a monopoly in the manufacture of a necessary of life"[ 1] [ 1]
The Court ruled that manufacturing, in this case, refining, was a local activity, not subject to congressional regulation of interstate commerce. Fuller wrote:
That which belongs to commerce is within the jurisdiction of the United States, but that which does not belong to commerce is within the jurisdiction of the police power of the State. . . . Doubtless the power to control the manufacture of a given thing involves in a certain sense the control of its disposition, but . . . affects it only incidentally and indirectly.
The decision required any action against manufacturing monopolies to be taken by individual states. The ruling prevailed until the end of the 1930s, when the Court took a different position on the federal government's power to regulate the economy.[citation needed
In his dissent, Harlan argued "the doctrine of the autonomy of the states cannot properly be invoked to justify a denial of power in the national government to meet such an emergency." He continued to argue the Constitution gives Congress "authority to enact all laws necessary and proper" to regulate commerce and cited McCulloch v. Maryland [ 1]
Although the decision was never expressly overturned, the Court later retreated from its position in a series of cases such as Swift and Company v. United States E.C. Knight came to be a precedent narrowed to its precise facts, with no other force.[citation needed
^ a b c d United States v. E. C. Knight Co. , 156 U.S. 1 (1895).
Statutes and Supreme Court
Sherman Antitrust Act
United States v. E. C. Knight Co. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States Northern Securities Co. v. United States Swift & Co. v. United States Loewe v. Lawlor Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States United States v. American Tobacco Co. United States v. Terminal Railroad Association Chicago Board of Trade v. United States United States v. Colgate & Co. Federal Baseball Club v. National League United States v. General Electric Co. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United States United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC United States v. Masonite Corp. United States v. Univis Lens Co. Parker v. Brown United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n Associated Press v. United States Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. International Salt Co. v. United States United States v. Line Material Co. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. United States v. United States Gypsum Co. Besser Manufacturing Co. v. United States Lorain Journal Co. v. United States United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc. United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. Radovich v. National Football League Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. United States v. Parke, Davis & Co. United States v. Loew's Inc. United States v. Wise Silver v. New York Stock Exchange United States v. Singer Mfg. Co. Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. Albrecht v. Herald Co. Haywood v. National Basketball Association Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. Flood v. Kuhn Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar Continental Television, Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS Inc. California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp. Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society Rice v. Norman Williams Co. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan State Oil Co. v. Khan Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. Texaco Inc. v. Dagher Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co. Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc. American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC Ohio v. American Express Co. National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston Interstate Commerce Act Clayton Antitrust Act FTC Act case lawRobinson–Patman Act Other cases
Other federal Ongoing Related topics ‡ date of filing
Dormant Commerce Clause
Brown v. Maryland Willson v. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co. Cooley v. Board of Wardens Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois Swift & Co. v. United States George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. Malloy Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc. Edwards v. California Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Dean Milk Co. v. City of Madison Miller Bros. Co. v. Maryland Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. National Bellas Hess v. Illinois Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland Reeves, Inc. v. Stake Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. Sporhase v. Nebraska ex rel. Douglas White v. Mass. Council of Construction Employers South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke Maine v. Taylor Healy v. Beer Institute, Inc. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon C&A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy Granholm v. Heald United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. Thomas National Pork Producers Council v. Ross Others
Copyright Act of 1790 Patent Act of 1793 Patent infringement case lawPatentability case lawCopyright Act of 1831 Copyright Act of 1870 Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 International Copyright Act of 1891 Copyright Act of 1909 Patent misuse case lawClayton Antitrust Act of 1914 Lanham Act
Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc. San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co. College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc. Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co. Matal v. Tam Iancu v. Brunetti Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. Copyright Act of 1976
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid Stewart v. Abend Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc. Quality King Distributors Inc., v. L'anza Research International Inc. Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. New York Times Co. v. Tasini Eldred v. Ashcroft MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick Golan v. Holder Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc. Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc. Allen v. Cooper Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. Other copyright cases Other patent cases
Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde United States v. General Electric Co. United States v. Univis Lens Co. Altvater v. Freeman Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp. Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther Brulotte v. Thys Co. Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. Graham v. John Deere Co. United States v. Adams Brenner v. Manson Lear, Inc. v. Adkins Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. Gottschalk v. Benson United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. Dann v. Johnston Sakraida v. Ag Pro Inc. Parker v. Flook Diamond v. Chakrabarty Diamond v. Diehr Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc. Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co. Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. Dickinson v. Zurko Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank J. E. M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. Bilski v. Kappos Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A. Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. Kappos v. Hyatt Bowman v. Monsanto Co. Gunn v. Minton Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. FTC v. Actavis, Inc. Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. Other trademark cases
Works related to United States v. E. C. Knight Company at Wikisource